Networking Reference
In-Depth Information
50. G.R. Montinola, Proxies and experience as bases of trust in courts, in Whom Can We Trust?
How Groups, Networks and Institutions Make Trust Possible , ed. by K.S. Cook, M. Levi,
R. Hardin (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 2009), pp. 286-307
51. R. Nisbett, K. Peng, I. Choi, A. Norenzayan, Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus
analytic cognition. Psychol. Rev. 108 (2), 291-310 (2001)
52. J.J. Ockerman, Over-reliance issues with task-guidance systems, in Proceedings of the Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting , Houston, 1999, pp. 1192-1196
53. A. Pagden, The destruction of trust and its consequences in eighteenth century naples, in Trust:
Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations , ed. by D. Gambetta (Blackwell, New York, 1988)
54. R. Parasuraman, T. Sheridan, C. Wickens, A model for types and levels of human interaction
with automation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Hum. 30 (3), 286-297 (2000)
55. R.E. Petty, J.T. Cacioppo, Attitude and Persuasion: Classic and Comtemporary Approaches
(Westview Press, Boulder, 1981)
56. R.E. Petty, J.T. Cacioppo,
The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion.
Adv. Exp. Soc.
Psychol. 19 , 123-205 (1986)
57. P. Pirolli, W.-T. Fu, Snif-act: a model of information foraging on the world wide web, in User
Modeling 2003 , ed. by P. Brusilovsky, A.T. Corbett, F. de Rosis (Springer, London/New York,
2003), p. 146
58. B. Reeves, C. Nass, The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New
Media Like Real People and Places (Center for the Study of Language and Inf, 2003, Stanford,
59. J. Rempel, J. Holmes, M. Zanna, Trust in close relationships. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 49 (1),
95-112 (1995)
60. J.B. Rotter, A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J. Personal. 35 , 651-665
61. J.B. Rotter, Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. Am. Psychol. 35 , 1-7 (1980)
62. D.M. Rousseau, S.B. Sitkin, R.S. Burt, C. Camerer, Not so different after all: a cross-discipline
view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23 , 393-404 (1998)
63. S. Saavedraa, K. Hagerty, B. Uzzi, Synchronicity, instant messaging, and performance among
financial traders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (PNAS), 1018462108v1-201018462 (2011)
64. F.D. Schoorman, R.C. Mayer, J.H. Davis, An integrative model of organizational trust: past,
present and future. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32 (2), 344-354 (2007)
65. D.A. Schum, J.R. Morris, Assessing the competence and credibility of human resources of
intelligence evidence: contributions from law and probability. Law Probab. Risk 6 , 247-274
66. E. Sillence, P. Briggs, P.R. Harris, L. Fishwick, How do patients evaluate and make use of
online health information? Soc. Sci. Med. 64 , 1853-1862 (2007)
67. T. Singer, S.J. Kiebel, J.S. Winston, R.J. Dolan, C.D. Frith, Brain responses to the acquired
moral status of faces. Neuron 41 (4), 653-662 (2004)
68. S.B. Sitkin, N.L. Roth, Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for
trust/distrust. Organ. Sci. 4 (3), 367-392 (1993)
69. K.J. Stewart, Y. Zhang, Effects of hypertext links on trust transfer, in Proceedings of ICEC ,
Pittsburgh, 2003, pp. 235-239
70. A. Todorov, N.N. Oosterhof, Modeling social perception of faces. IEEE Signal Process. Mag.
28 , 117 (2011)
71. M. Tomasello, M. Carpenter, J. Call, T. Behne, H. Moll, Understanding and sharing intentions:
the origins of cultural cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 28 (5), 675-91; discussion 691-735 (2005)
72. B. Uzzi, The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of
organizations: the network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61 , 674-698 (1996)
73. B. Uzzi, A social network's changing statistical properties and the quality of human innovation.
J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 , 224023 (12pgs) (2008)
74. M. van 't Wout, A.G. Sanfey, Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in
social decision-making. Cognition 108 (3), 796-803 (2008)
Search MirCeyron ::

Custom Search